- Documentation
- /
- Epa
- /
Quick Reference
Menu map, demo-data codes and statuses
Menu Map
| Group | Models |
|---|---|
| Overview | Exploration Project, Investor Update |
| Programme | Work Programme, Programme Activity, Programme Milestone, Exploration Campaign, Campaign Progress, Assay Batch |
| Evidence & Learning | Exploration Target, Exploration Hypothesis, Evidence Item, Hypothesis Evidence, Uncertainty Dimension, Uncertainty Assessment |
| Decisions & Capital | Decision Gate, Gate Criterion, Decision, Funding Facility, Capital Call, Budget Period, Budget Line, Expenditure |
| Assurance | Project Risk, Project Issue, Tenement, KPI Snapshot |
Key Codes in the Demo Data
The demo runs two projects for one operator — Meridian Exploration Ltd — so
the contrast between a live, funded execution and a parked opportunity is visible
at once. Almost every populated row belongs to PRJ-CF Copperfield; PRJ-KN
exists to show the on-hold case.
| Code | What it is |
|---|---|
PRJ-CF |
Copperfield — Copper-Gold IOCG, AU-WA, InitialDrilling, Active. The whole worked chain. $1.85M approved / $0.54M spent / 9-month runway |
PRJ-KN |
Kalahari Nickel — Nickel, Botswana, TargetValidation, OnHold pending modern EM. The parked case; overall risk High |
E29/1234 |
Copperfield East tenement — Granted, OnTrack (compliance surfaced here, governed in the licence app) |
PL-201/2025 |
Kalahari Nickel PL — Application, AtRisk |
FAC-CF-EQ |
Copperfield Placement 2026 — the equity facility. $2.0M approved / $1.2M drawn / $0.8M remaining, Available |
FAC-CF-GR |
WA Exploration Incentive Co-fund — a $180k government drilling Grant, Approved, undrawn |
CC-CF-01 |
Capital call — $600k Funded, mobilised the RC campaign (linked to DEC-CF-01) |
CC-CF-02 |
Capital call — $400k Approved, not yet received; funds the assay backlog + infill magnetics |
BUD-CF-FY26 |
Copperfield FY26 budget period — $1.85M approved / $0.54M actual, variance -1.6%, Active |
BL-CF-DRILL |
Budget line — RC drilling, $900k approved / $420k actual |
BL-CF-ASSAY |
Budget line — assay & QAQC, $180k approved / $60k actual |
WP-CF-FY26 |
Copperfield FY26 Drilling work programme — Annual, 32% complete, Active, owner J. Nguyen |
ACT-CF-RC |
Programme activity — RC drilling, InProgress, 1050 of 3200 m (33%) |
ACT-CF-MAG |
Programme activity — infill magnetic survey, Ready, blocked awaiting CC-CF-02 |
MS-CF-01 |
Milestone — "First assays returned", AtRisk, investor_material |
MS-CF-02 |
Milestone — "Stage 1 decision", OnTrack, investor_material |
CMP-CF-RC1 |
Copperfield RC Campaign 1 — Drilling, Active, contractor Yilgarn Drilling Services. 6 of ~18 holes |
CMP-CF-RC1 progress |
Two CampaignProgress reports (31 Jul, 15 Aug 2026); 1 open issue, forecast final cost $930k |
BATCH-CF-01 |
The outstanding assay batch — Perth Assay Labs, 240 samples, qa_qc_status = Pending, 4 days overdue, Material |
BATCH-CF-00 |
The prior pre-collar batch — 90 samples, Pass, background values |
TGT-CF-01 |
Copperfield Magnetic High — IOCG target, rank 1, Testing. confidence 6.8, priority 8.1 |
HYP-CF-01 |
The concealed-IOCG hypothesis — PartiallySupported, confidence 0.45 → 0.62, trend Strengthening |
EV-CF-10 |
Evidence — the screening magnetic anomaly, evidence_origin = ScreeningTransferred, High / Material. The hand-off from eis |
EV-CF-11 |
Evidence — altered magnetite intercept in CF-RC-006, CompanyGenerated / DrillResult, unverified |
UNC-CF-COVER |
Cover thickness / source depth — Reducing, 6.0 → target 2.5. Assessment bought 2.0 points for $420k (4.76/$M) |
UNC-CF-GRADE |
Copper grade tenor — Open, 7.5 → target 3.0. Cannot move until assays return (only 0.5 bought so far) |
DG-CF-1 |
Stage 1 Resourcing Decision gate — Stage, sequence 1, Preparing, NotSet outcome. Blocked on grade |
GC-CF-01 |
Gate criterion — "confirmed copper grade", mandatory, NotAssessed (the blocker), evidence BATCH-CF-01 |
GC-CF-02 |
Gate criterion — "funding runway", mandatory, Pass (9 months) |
DEC-CF-01 |
Decision — Fund the FY26 RC campaign, $900k, investor_material, approved by Board |
DEC-KN-01 |
Decision — Pause Kalahari pending modern EM (no gate, no target). Not investor-material |
RSK-CF-01 |
Risk — assay turnaround delay, Schedule, 3×3 residual Moderate, Monitoring, investor-material |
RSK-CF-02 |
Risk — barren alteration, Geological, 3×4 residual High, trend Improving, Mitigating |
ISS-CF-01 |
Issue — ground-conditions stand-down, Low, Resolved |
ISS-CF-02 |
Issue — assay QAQC standard failure, Moderate, Actioning (re-submitting pulps) |
IU-CF-Q1 |
The investor update — audience Investors, 31 Aug 2026, Approved. Next funding requirement $400k |
| KPI snapshot | 31 Aug 2026 — variance -1.6%, progress 32%, milestone on-time 50%, assay TAT 13 d, 0 critical risks, evidence-verified 60%, capital_per_uncertainty_point = $210k |
The Copperfield Story, Step by Step
- Hand-off from eis. The magnetic-high anomaly arrives as
EV-CF-10(ScreeningTransferred) andDEC-CF-01funds the RC campaign —$900koffFAC-CF-EQvia capital callCC-CF-01. - Mobilise.
CMP-CF-RC1spuds on schedule (25 Jul 2026); the firstCampaignProgressreport shows 490 m, no issues. - Early encouragement. Hole CF-RC-006 logs 24 m of magnetite-chlorite
alteration — evidence
EV-CF-11, which liftsHYP-CF-01from 0.55 to 0.62. - Learning per dollar. The cover-thickness uncertainty
UNC-CF-COVERis re-scored 8.0 → 6.0 on the early holes — 2.0 points for$420k,4.76/$M. GradeUNC-CF-GRADEbarely moves: the assays are not back. - The bottleneck. Assay batch
BATCH-CF-01(240 samples) isPendingand 4 days overdue; milestoneMS-CF-01"first assays returned" goesAtRisk; riskRSK-CF-01(turnaround delay) is being monitored. - The gate waits.
DG-CF-1isPreparing. Funding runway (GC-CF-02) is aPass, but confirmed grade (GC-CF-01) isNotAssessed— so no Stage 1 call can be made untilBATCH-CF-01returns. - Report outward.
IU-CF-Q1tells investors the programme is on track (32%), marginally under budget (-1.6%), with grade unconfirmed and$400k(CC-CF-02) the next ask. TheKpiSnapshotcarries the same reality as numbers.
Status Vocabularies (the important ones)
Project stage: TargetValidation · InitialDrilling · ResourceDefinition ·
Scoping · PreFeasibility · Feasibility
Project status: Active · OnHold · Completed · Stopped
Programme status: Draft · Approved · Active · AtRisk · OnHold · Complete ·
Cancelled
Programme activity status: NotStarted · Ready · InProgress · Blocked ·
Complete · Cancelled
Milestone status: NotDue · OnTrack · AtRisk · Overdue · Complete · Waived
Campaign status: Planned · Ready · Active · Paused · Complete · Cancelled
Assay QA/QC status: Pending · Pass · Conditional · Fail
Result materiality (assay/evidence): Routine · Important · Material
Hypothesis status: Open · Supported · PartiallySupported · Contradicted ·
Retired; confidence trend: Strengthening · Stable · Weakening · Unresolved
Evidence origin: ScreeningTransferred · CompanyGenerated · ExternalStudy ·
Assay · FieldObservation; quality: Low · Moderate · High · Verified
Hypothesis–evidence relationship: Supports · Weakens · Contradicts ·
Neutral · Pending (strength Weak · Moderate · Strong)
Uncertainty status: Open · Reducing · Stable · Increasing · Resolved
Decision-gate status: Future · Preparing · Ready · Deferred · Passed ·
Conditional · Failed · Cancelled
Gate recommended / actual outcome: Proceed · ProceedConditional · Hold ·
Rework · Stop · Divest · NotSet
Gate-criterion assessment: NotAssessed · Pass · Conditional · Fail ·
NotApplicable
Decision type: Fund · Continue · Expand · Reduce · Pause · Redirect · Stop ·
Partner · Divest
Funding-facility status: Proposed · Approved · Available · FullyDrawn ·
Suspended · Closed; facility type: Equity · JVContribution · Debt · Grant ·
Streaming · Royalty · Internal
Capital-call status: Draft · Submitted · Approved · PartFunded · Funded ·
Rejected · Cancelled
Budget-period status: Draft · Approved · Active · Closed
Risk / issue severity & rating: Low · Moderate · High · Critical
Risk status: Open · Monitoring · Mitigating · Accepted · Closed;
risk trend: Improving · Stable · Worsening
Issue status: Open · Actioning · Blocked · Resolved · Closed
Tenement licence status: Application · Granted · RenewalPending · Suspended ·
Expired · Relinquished; compliance: OnTrack · AtRisk · NonCompliant · Unknown
Investor-update publication: Draft · Review · Approved · Published;
audience: Board · Investors · JVPartners · Lenders · Public
Rules of Thumb
- Everything hangs off the project.
ExplorationProjectis the root of 24 of the 45 relationships;ExplorationTargetis the second hub (evidence, hypotheses, uncertainty and target decisions). Start any trace at one of the two. - Source of money ≠ purpose of money.
FundingFacility/CapitalCalltrack liquidity;BudgetPeriod/BudgetLine/Expendituretrack burn. Reconcile them through capital calls — do not read either axis as the whole picture. - Confidence only moves through a link. A hypothesis's
current_confidenceshould always be reconstructable from itsHypothesisEvidencerows'confidence_before → confidence_aftersteps. A jump with no link behind it is a data error. - Capital efficiency is a stored number.
UncertaintyAssessment.reduction_per_millionis the app's headline metric — points of doubt removed per$M. Grade cannot move until assays return; that is whyUNC-CF-GRADEreads 0.5 andUNC-CF-COVERreads 2.0. - A gate is blocked by its mandatory criteria.
DG-CF-1cannot proceed whileGC-CF-01(confirmed grade) isNotAssessed, no matter thatGC-CF-02(runway) passes. The mandatory flag is load-bearing. - Risk is forward, issue is live. A
ProjectRiskmight happen and is scored likelihood × consequence; aProjectIssuealready happened and is raised against a campaign. Both carryinvestor_material. - The roll-ups are seeded, not computed. Project totals, budget variances, programme progress and every KpiSnapshot field are stored values consistent with the rows beneath them — nothing recalculates them live (Phase 2).